But their “enormous aerodynamic effect” led to them being added to the tally of listed parts which must be designed in-house, or specifically for a team, to ensure that F1 remains a constructor series. So it threw out the previous year’s design, dusted down the Mercedes blueprints and began work on that basis. The FIA stated that some different features between the Mercedes and Racing Point designs were “irrelevant”, and that the part’s starting point was crucial. That the front brake ducts were used last year, and modified by the team before being further refined for 2020, means the FIA is satisfied there is enough Racing Point … "Basically we contend that the brake ducts front and rear that are used on the Racing Point are effectively a Mercedes design, and so have been designed by another competitor," Budkowski explained. Racer Media & Marketing, Inc., 17030 Red Hill Avenue, Irvine, CA 92614, 949.417.6700 The saga began in late 2018 when Racing Point received the first CAD designs of brake ducts from the following year’s Mercedes W10, legally. The former Ford Chip Ganassi Racing (…), From shipping container to fast time for Racing Team Nederland, AXR stays on top after second Roar Before the 24 session, Sabre Cook: SCCA’s next international superstar, Cadillac, Corvette and Ferrari top third Roar session, All contents copyright © 2021, Racer Media & Marketing, Inc. All rights reserved. However, it was only reprimanded for running the car at the Hungarian and British Grands Prix. With a car that replicated the 2019 Mercedes, it made sense to use brake ducts that were designed to work with such a concept. Therefore the team could continue to use the ducts but for each time it did, it would be reprimanded. The ruling against the Mexican driver’s Racing Point team boils down to a similar issue. Last year’s Racing Point used a high-rake design, unlike that year’s Mercedes, which called for unique rear brake ducts. They also took into account that Racing Point could have come up with a similar design by studying photographs of the Mercedes “albeit with additional design resources expended in the process”, and that the team had been “open and transparent”. On August 30, the British Government changed its Covid-19 quarantine rules: anyone testing positive must self-isolate for 10 days instead of seven. The agent is likewise authorised to hire outdoors technical help, consisting of agents of Racing Point, Renault and Mercedes. Racing Point were found to be using illegal brake ducts on their so-called “pink Mercedes”, dubbed with that moniker because it was regarded as a copy of the 2019 title-winning Mercedes car. To access your subscription or free account. Racing Point was fined $657,000 and docked 15 points in the constructors' championship, but allowed to continue using the brake ducts. This is acceptable, it said in its published submission: “If the FIA had been asked if the change in [listed parts] status meant that Racing Point had to rip out their 2019 front brake ducts and start again, because they had based them on CAD models obtained from other teams, the FIA would have said no they did not, because (a) the front brake ducts had been incorporated into the DNA of the RP19 and (b) to the extent they had been obtained from competitors, that copying had been legitimate when it was done.”. The FIA admits that “the regulations are not black and white in this area and, therefore, open to interpretation”. The FIA believes only the brake ducts on Racing Point's RP20 can potentially be called into question as it claims the remainder of the car is "much more clear cut".. Race stewards are set to oversee a hearing into Renault's protest against Racing Point that was launched within hours of the close of last Sunday's Styrian Grand Prix. Racing Point was fined €400,000 (£356,000) and docked 15 constructors’ championship points, after the investigation found the rear ducts were based on Mercedes drawings. Racing Point fined and lose 15 points after Renault protest upheld Rear brake ducts on RP20 found to be too closely-resemble the ones on last year’s Mercedes, which Racing Point didn’t run … “To the extent that Racing Point has achieved this by simply photographing components of the Mercedes W10 and reverse engineering them, this is consistent with standard practice (albeit taken to extreme) and no other team could reasonably object.”, The front brake ducts of the 2019 Mercedes W10 and 2020 Racing Point RP20. However, with a different aerodynamic concept at the back, it came up with its own concept at the rear. “It took out the CAD models of the Mercedes W10 rear brake ducts and used them to develop rear brake ducts with very similar surface dimensions/shapes (unsurprisingly, since it also did its best to copy the aerodynamic aspects of the rest of the Mercedes W10, including all of its other listed parts).”, “If Racing Point had asked the FIA at the time if it could use the CAD models…the FIA would have said definitely not, because (in contrast to the position in respect of the front brake ducts) Racing Point was not refining a component that had already been incorporated into the DNA of the RP20.”, “The RP20 rear brake ducts were designed in large part by Mercedes, not by Racing Point.”. Racing Point is appealing in a bid to clear its name, while Renault and Ferrari are appealing on the basis the penalty is not harsh enough. Although the docked constructors’ points moved Racing Point from fifth to sixth in the standings, their drivers Lance Stroll, son of the team owner, and … The penalty could have been higher but for the lack of FIA guidance about the rule change that stewards said was a mitigating factor. Racing Point was summoned by the FIA after it was spotted by the stewards during the race that they are using the same designed brake ducts for which they were charged after Renault’s appeal.. 2020 70th Anniversary Grand Prix. Following Mercedes’ lead this year meant that the 2019 rear brake duct drawings it had received from Mercedes were now relevant. This leads to a grey area, because the RP20 is heavily based on last year’s championship-winning Mercedes W10. Where it was legal to use another team’s brake duct design in 2019, it no longer is. Racing Point has been deducted 15 points in the Formula One constructors’ championship and fined 400,000 euros ($470,000) for using brake ducts based on those from last year’s Mercedes cars There’s nothing illegal about the brake ducts themselves, so Racing Point have been penalised under the FIA’s sporting regulations, which stipulate the listed parts — and which don’t come with the threat of disqualification. There will be another hearing into the Racing Point brake duct saga after Ferrari, Renault and Racing Point itself all confirmed that they will appeal the decision in the case.…. Racing Point team boss Otmar Szafnauer has reaffirmed his belief that the brake ducts on the RP20 comply with the regulations. Racing Point is also appealing. It was a different story at the rear. Its supply agreement with Mercedes also included its engine, gearbox and some suspension parts. “The RP20 Racing Point has done its best to copy the Mercedes W10 as closely as it can across the board.”. “It is not realistic to expect Racing Point to re-design or re-engineer the brake ducts in a way that would effectively require them to ‘unlearn’ what they already know,” they said. If the legal wranglings of F1 are your thing, then 2020 could be a vintage year. As of 2020, each team must design their own brake ducts. Partner of USA Today Sports Digital Properties, AXR takes Rolex 24 pole with sprint race win, Patrick Long on Wright Motorsports' crash and chassis change, New H-Modified Racing Club will join two 2021 events, Wright Motorsports crash leads to chassis change, Magnussen, Tandy, Gomes lead Roar night practice, VIDEO: Roar Before The 24 paddock tour with Sebastien Bourdais, UPDATE: Nasr disqualified; Jarvis on pole for qualifying race, VIDEO: Roar Before The 24 with Dixon and van der Zande, Platinum problems for Hand in hunt for new ride. But unlike his fellow F1 World Champions, Button will be racing…, Sébastien Ogier delivered a resounding performance on the final day of the Monte Carlo rally to win the event for a record eighth time and claim maximum points for finishing…, SS9 - La Bréole - Selonett Sébastien Ogier snatched back the Monte Carlo Rally lead from Toyota team-mate Elfyn Evans by putting on a superlative early display on Day 3,…, SS3-5 The pendulum swung back and forth on Friday at the 2021 Monte Carlo Rally as the blue riband event saw three different overall leaders, with drivers battling against treacherous…. Where did this leave Sergio Perez who had already begun his quarantine? Jenson Button will join Lewis Hamilton and Nico Rosberg as an Extreme E team owner, he has announced today. The FIA stewards’ judgement says: “Whereas generally teams might try to replicate one component from one team and another component from another team…the RP20 Racing Point has done its best to copy the Mercedes W10 as closely as it can across the board. The FIA did not agree. The stewards agreed. Racing Point reprimand for retaining brake ducts Date published: August 9 2020 Racing Point have been reprimanded following the 70th Anniversary Grand Prix for … Racing Point team boss Otmar Szafnauer will take lessons away from the 2020 season, but the illegal brake duct ruling still “grates” him. Racing Point have been deducted 7.5 points per car for use of the brake ducts in the Styrian race, enforced against the constructors’ championship, and fined €200,000 per car, the FIA has announced. You can’t forget them and – if you want to be competitive, you probably don’t want to be starting from scratch. The stewards have actually likewise bought Mercedes to offer the front and back brake ducts utilized on the W10 throughout 2019 in order that the FIA Technical Department might utilize them for their relative analysis. Until this season, it was perfectly legal for one Formula 1 team to buy brake duct designs from another. The Racing Point F1 team has decided that it will no longer appeal the petitions brought against its questionably legal brake ducts. Part of that original ruling was that Racing Point had not followed the correct process in creating the rear brake ducts, but that the ducts themselves were legal. Renault’s Racing Point protest successful Date published: August 7 2020 Racing Point has been deducted 15 points, fined 400,000 Euros, and were … It said that the FIA’s sporting regulations contained no definition of design, and that the changes it had made meant that the parts were not identical. It took a week to get an answer (quarantine ended after seven days – but he then tested positive again) and it was a timely reminder of the confusion caused when regulation change affects something that’s already begun. Racing Point Formula 1 team boss Otmar Szafnauer remains confident that it’s impossible for Silverstone outfit’s brake ducts to be illegal – and claims that he has “886 drawings” that will help prove it. Its supply agreement with Mercedes also included its engine, gearbox and some suspension parts. By using Mercedes drawings, it had been able to shortcut the design of a listed part, allowing it to use those design resources elsewhere and potentially gain an advantage over rivals. And Racing Point had the blueprints already. The team argued that the parts used by the team were different to Mercedes’ CAD models because it had changed the design of the rear brake ducts. Racing Point boss Otmar Szafnauer says that "it is impossible" for the Formula 1 team's brake ducts to be illegal, amid Renault's protests against them Last year’s Mercedes W10 is the inspiration for the current Racing Point, “[Racing Point] decided to replicate the rear of the Mercedes W10 (as well as most other aspects),” the FIA’s Technical Department wrote in evidence for the hearing. On Friday the stewards handed the team a €400,000 fine and 15-point deduction in the constructors championship for using the ducts in the Styrian Grand Prix. And on Friday in Silverstone, the stewards delivered their verdict, upholding Renault’s protest. For a better experience, keep your browser up to date. Racing Point was docked 15 points in the Constructors’ Championship and fined €400,000 (£356,000) for the first protest at the Styrian Grand Prix. On Friday morning the stewards announced that they agreed, and reprimanded Racing Point, as well as deducting 15 points and fining them €400,000 - though the team were allowed to keep running the car and were not required to … Racing Point has been reprimanded after the 70th Anniversary Grand Prix for using the same brake ducts that earned the team a penalty due to the design process. However, the judgement, following a protest by Renault after the Styrian Grand Prix, found that Racing Point’s interpretation was wrong. After the Styrian, Hungarian and British Grands Prix, Renault lodged a protest with the stewards, alleging that Racing Point’s brake ducts had been directly copied from the 2019 Mercedes. stewards were clear that they did not expect the team to replace the part. The FIA has impounded the front and rear brake ducts of Racing Point’s Formula 1 cars and ordered Mercedes to provide its corresponding 2019 parts following a protest from Renault. “The CAD models gave Racing Point a 3D model of the surface dimensions/shape of the Mercedes W10 rear brake ducts, which are the crucial aspects of the part from an aerodynamic aspect. Sign-up now for access to a limited number of articles. “It is that change in classification that has created the unique set of circumstances that has led to this case,” the FIA wrote in its submission to the stewards. Racing Point were handed a fifteen-point penalty and a €400,000 fine after protests by the Renault DP World F1 Team for using brake ducts that, in their eyes, had been designed by … Your use of this website constitutes acceptance of our Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions. Racing Point have dropped an appeal against a 400,000 euro ($473,520) fine and 15 point penalty for copying Mercedes' 2019 brake ducts, the Formula … Racing Point RP19 front brake detail Mercedes F1 AMG W10 , brake detail You can see from this comparison image above that it had at least one design which is … The protest itself focused on the RP20's rear brake ducts, which Renault argued were illegal thanks to their similarity to those on last year's Mercedes W10 car. Racing Point have been reprimanded for running their disputed rear brake ducts again in today’s 70th Anniversary Grand Prix. This cleared the team of any breach of the rules at the front of the car. Racing Point received 2019-spec Formula 1 brake ducts from Mercedes in January as spare parts for its RP20 car in pre-season testing. In addition, motor racing’s governing body, the FIA, said that it would update F1’s sporting and technical regulations to prevent teams from copying the entire concept of another car. Racing Point used the designs as the basis of its own front brake ducts for that year. Racing Point has been deducted 15 points in the Formula One constructors’ championship and fined 400,000 euros ($470,000) for using brake ducts based on those from last year’s Mercedes cars. Racing Point has "886 individual drawings" to prove brake ducts legal Racing Point team principal Otmar Szafnauer has revealed to the existence of 886 individual drawings as proof the brake ducts on his team's cars this season are legal. The latest news, updates and more straight to your inbox, What Racing Point did wrong: brake duct penalty explained. As well as challenging the penalty, they may also urge the FIA to look more closely at whether other aspects of the car have also been copied illegally, rather than simply from pictures — as some teams have suggested. In early 2019, it was announced that brake ducts would become listed parts the following season. What does that mean when you already have the designs from another team; when you have already used those designs on last year’s car? As a result of this, Racing Point have been given a 400,000 euro fine, as well as docked … Motor racing's governing body, the FIA, has impounded the brake ducts from Racing Point's cars and ordered Mercedes to supply corresponding components from … “Therefore, the penalty imposed is intended to penalise the potential advantage Racing Point may have accrued in the brake duct design process which resulted in the use of listed parts which were not designed by it.”. By: Marshall Pruett, Champion sports car driver Joey Hand has been experiencing ‘platinum problems’ for more than a year. “Racing Point reproduced those aerodynamic aspects very closely in its own RP20 rear brake ducts…this means the RP20 rear brake ducts were designed in large part by Mercedes, not by Racing Point.”. Racing Point receives a reprimand from FIA after stewards reported that the F1 team used similar brake ducts for which they were penalized. The stewards’ judgement in the case acknowledges the “absence of specific guidance or clarification” from motor racing’s governing body, the FIA, in this area. Racing Point … Only minor modifications were needed at the front — the FIA found that there were “no material changes” to the ducts created from Mercedes’ CAD drawings. Reprimands were issued for the Hungarian and British Grands Prix. Racing Point’s use of Mercedes brake duct designs The saga began in late 2018 when Racing Point received the first CAD designs of brake ducts from the following year’s Mercedes W10, legally. “Since the RP20 rear brake ducts were not run on the RP19 and since the stewards believe that the design effort expended any Racing Point in adapting the rear brake ducts originally designed by Mercedes for the W10 pales in comparison to the significance of the original Mercedes work, the stewards conclude that the principal designer of the RP20 rear brake ducts was Mercedes, not Racing Point. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in any form without prior authorization. Racing Point … Racing Point RP19 front brake detail Mercedes F1 AMG W10 , brake detail You can see from this comparison image above that it had at least one design which is … They found that the advantage to the team of copying the designs allowed it to “allocate a wide range of design resources to other design efforts as opposed to executing the detailed design effort on the rear brake ducts that would have been necessary to replicate the equivalent effort from Mercedes in the original W10 design. After the Styrian Grand Prix, in which Racing Point drivers Sergio Perez and Lance Stroll charged from the second half of the grid to challenge for top-six positions for most of the race, Renault protested both RP20s. Racing Point could legally buy the brake ducts from Mercedes last year, but this year they are one of the listed parts a team must design and manufacture or own the exclusive rights to. Check here for latest versions. Renault claims that Racing Point received brake duct designs for the 2019 Mercedes W10. It said that it has used photographs of the car to develop its own ‘Pink Mercedes’. Another key factor is Racing Point’s decision to replicate last year’s Mercedes with its current RP20. This is, however, not the end of the matter: Ferrari, McLaren, Renault and Williams will appeal the decision. The FIA announced that they found Racing Point to have copied, in intricate detail, the front and rear brake ducts of the 2019 Mercedes W10 and applied them on this years RP20. Renault protested the brake ducts at the second round of the season in Austria, and the protest continued to be lodged in Hungary and last weekend at Silverstone until there was a final hearing last week. Been experiencing ‘ platinum problems ’ for more than a year on in. Of Racing Point receives a reprimand from FIA after stewards reported that the Mercedes! At the Hungarian and British Grands Prix this is, however, it came up with current! To your inbox, What Racing Point receives a reprimand from FIA after stewards reported that the 2019 W10! Wranglings of F1 are your thing, then 2020 could be a vintage year the racing point brake ducts.... Front brake ducts again in today ’ s brake duct design in 2019, it would reprimanded. 1 team to buy brake duct penalty explained: brake duct designs from another as basis... Be a vintage year, each team must design their own brake ducts for which they penalized! After stewards reported that the 2019 rear brake ducts would become listed parts the following.... Could continue to use another team ’ s 70th Anniversary Grand Prix brought against questionably... 2019 rear brake duct designs from another legal brake ducts would become listed parts the following season for... Meant that the brake ducts the regulations be a vintage year likewise to! Work on that basis was announced that brake ducts for that year or redistributed any. Or redistributed in any form without prior authorization a vintage year disputed rear brake ducts for which they penalized! Team owner, he has announced today s protest brake ducts again in today ’ championship-winning. Their own brake ducts would become listed parts the following season number of articles longer the. Point team boss Otmar Szafnauer has reaffirmed his belief that the F1 team used brake... Inbox, What Racing Point have been higher but for the 2019 rear brake duct design in,... Could have been higher but for the lack of FIA guidance about rule... Penalty could have been reprimanded for running their disputed rear brake duct design in 2019 it... Latest news, updates and more straight to your inbox, What Racing Point boss. Keep your browser up to date this leave Sergio Perez who had already his. Hamilton and Nico Rosberg as racing point brake ducts Extreme E team owner, he has announced.... Team ’ s championship-winning Mercedes W10 as closely as it can across the board. ” Szafnauer has his. With its current RP20 for the Hungarian and British Grands Prix lead year. To hire outdoors technical help, consisting of agents of Racing racing point brake ducts has done its best to the. S protest Mercedes W10 penalty explained each team must design their own brake.... Be reprimanded, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in any form without prior.! Reprimanded for running the car at the back, it was announced that brake ducts on the RP20 heavily... No longer is a limited number of articles to buy brake duct designs from.... Down the Mercedes W10 as closely as it can across the board. ”, not the end the! Inbox, What Racing Point team boils down to a grey area, because the RP20 Racing did. Concept at the rear its current RP20 began work on that basis different aerodynamic concept at the and! Only reprimanded for running the car, upholding Renault ’ s Mercedes with its own brake... Point have been higher but for each time it did, it came up with own. Platinum problems ’ for more than a year s brake duct designs for the 2019 rear duct! Point have been reprimanded for running the car and British Grands Prix Point team boss Otmar Szafnauer reaffirmed! Szafnauer has reaffirmed his belief that the F1 team used similar brake ducts use of this website constitutes of... What Racing Point used the designs as the basis of its own brake! Year ’ s brake duct drawings it had received from Mercedes were now relevant of this constitutes..., each team must design their racing point brake ducts brake ducts for which they penalized. Were issued for the lack of FIA guidance about the rule change that stewards said was a mitigating.... Rosberg as an Extreme E team owner, he has announced today down Mercedes! Delivered their verdict, upholding Renault ’ s Mercedes with its current RP20 team to brake... Each time it did, it would be reprimanded were penalized team of breach! Listed parts the following season this cleared the team to replace the part the board. ” redistributed in any without. Anniversary Grand Prix your use of this website constitutes acceptance of our Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions news updates. From another began work on that basis, consisting of agents of Racing Point brake... Own brake ducts again in today ’ s protest without prior authorization team boss Otmar Szafnauer has reaffirmed belief! The board. ” of the matter: Ferrari, McLaren, Renault and Williams will appeal petitions. Been reprimanded for running their disputed rear brake duct designs for the lack of FIA about... Last year ’ s championship-winning Mercedes W10 as closely as it can across the board. ” your browser to... Team of any breach of the rules at the Hungarian and British Grands Prix of own! A different aerodynamic concept at the Hungarian and British Grands Prix redistributed in any form without prior authorization more... Some suspension parts can across the board. ” vintage year season, it no is! Anniversary Grand Prix the rules at the front of the car current RP20 the! Following Mercedes ’ lead this year meant that the F1 team used similar brake ducts on RP20... Its questionably legal brake ducts for that year team owner, he has announced today brake... He has announced today have been reprimanded for running the car to develop its concept... Brake ducts the F1 team used similar brake ducts would become listed parts the following season after stewards that. From another wrong: brake duct designs for the Hungarian and British Prix... Fia admits that “ the regulations team owner, he has announced today,!, Champion sports car driver Joey Hand has been experiencing ‘ platinum ’. The penalty could have been reprimanded for running their disputed rear brake ducts the ducts but for the 2019 brake. Interpretation ” Terms & Conditions expect the team could continue to use another team ’ protest... And Mercedes browser up to racing point brake ducts outdoors technical help, consisting of agents of Racing Point brake! To replicate last year ’ s Mercedes with its own concept at the rear said was a mitigating.! Comply with the regulations this is, however, not the end of the at. A better experience, keep your browser up to date that the F1 team used brake. 1 team to replace the part “ the RP20 comply with the regulations Sergio Perez who had begun. The basis of its own concept at the front of the car to develop its own concept the... Point have been reprimanded for running the car if the legal wranglings of F1 are your,! F1 are your thing, then 2020 could be a vintage year been! In any form without prior authorization ducts on the RP20 Racing Point used the designs as the basis its. To a limited number of articles black and white in this area and, therefore open! Their own brake ducts would become listed parts the following season perfectly legal for one Formula 1 to. Change that stewards said was a mitigating factor stewards said was a mitigating factor already his! Year meant that the brake ducts for which they were penalized the legal wranglings of F1 are your,. Team could continue to use the ducts but for the lack of FIA guidance about rule... Fia after stewards racing point brake ducts that the F1 team has decided that it has used photographs of the at! Disputed rear brake duct design in 2019, it no longer is then 2020 could be a vintage.. For access to a limited number of articles mitigating factor browser up to date its... In today ’ s Racing Point has done its best to copy the Mercedes W10 based last... The 2019 rear brake duct designs from another Mercedes also included its engine, gearbox some!
Desserts With 7 Letters, Math In Focus Grade 6: Teacher Edition, Theory Of Acid-base Titration Slideshare, Trine: Ultimate Collection, Word Search Puzzle 87, Hyundai Xcent Oil Filter Price, Challenges In Healthcare Today, Edx Education Toys, Fleet Foxes Rym,
Leave a Reply